Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael's avatar

I think both this article and the bills the article mentions are missing the point.

If we in Florida "lead the nation in the number of people exonerated from death row," this means that judges are failing to ask the right questions of juries, or juries are failing to consider the right facts when answering the questions they are asked.

Once you phrase it that way, the solution, to avoid convicting people who didn't actually commit the crime, is obvious. Make the topics presented at a trial narrower. A death penalty trial in particular must have two phases. First, the jury must consider the question, "did the defendant kill the victim?" Then, if the jury returns "yes", the second phase of the trial, the "are there aggravating factors?" phase, would begin. During the first phase, the judge must strictly limit the facts and arguments presented, nothing about how heinous the crime was, nothing about how depraved the perpetrator was, nothing about how the victim's family deserves justice. Only information that shows the perpetrator, and no one else, did the crime should be presented. The first phase must be purely rational, and then and only then should the second phase be allowed to get emotional. All of the arguments and evidence can then be presented in the second phase.

No posts

Ready for more?