Last week, a Volusia County jury unanimously recommended that James Guzman be resentenced to death.
Were the hair tests/identifications important in this case? If so, did the court consider the limits of these tests: before 2000, the science of hair analysis could not make an identity to one person and therefore are invalid evidence.
Were the hair tests/identifications important in this case? If so, did the court consider the limits of these tests: before 2000, the science of hair analysis could not make an identity to one person and therefore are invalid evidence.